Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-82: UML diagrams

On Apr 16, 2008, at 2:51 PM, Elisa F. Kendall wrote:
> I am also willing to assist in educating folks in the working group  
> about the purpose of a metamodel, and why it is ideally suited to  
> the purposes specified in the FS&SS.  Leaving it as is will only  
> create confusion among UML savvy folks who are looking to this  
> working group for leadership.

Speaking as someone who is not UML savvy, I can say that they also  
create confusion if you don't use UML. Frankly, unless there is  
compelling evidence that these are useful to segment of our users, I  
would consider dropping them altogether.

-Alan

Received on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:55:42 UTC