I propose to resolve ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-109 by making the owl2 and owl2xml namespaces be the same as the owl namespace. Instead of the following namespaces owl http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# owl2 http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2# owl2xml http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2-xml# the situation would be owl http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# owl2 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# owl2xml http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# Actually there would then be no need for separate namespace prefixes. This means that owl2:onClass is in the same namespace as owl:onProperty, as is owl2xml:OWLClass Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs ResearchReceived on Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:31:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 April 2008 18:31:04 GMT