W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

comment on Profile document: Missing rule in OWL-R?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:40:37 +0200
Message-ID: <4804CC75.1060806@w3.org>
To: Alan Wu <alan.wu@oracle.com>
CC: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org> 
Alan,

The first rule in Table 5 of the profile document says

(?c rdf:type owl:Class) =>
	(?c rdfs:subClassOf ?c) and
	(?c owl:equivalentClasses ?c)

Isn't it necessary to have the same rule with rdfs:Class instead of 
owl:Class? Of course, that would lead out of the DL realm in the case of 
OWL-R-DL...:-(

Ivan

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2008 15:41:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 15 April 2008 15:41:18 GMT