W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Profiles intro

From: Alan Wu <alan.wu@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:50:12 -0400
Message-ID: <47FE1B14.20304@oracle.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


> Ok, I'll rephrase your point: Regardless of whether it's true or not, 
> RDFishness is not helpful in distinguishing fragments and may cause 
> extreme negative reactions. Thus, we should find other points for 
> guidance.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Could you please elaborate on the extreme negative reactions? 
Triple-friendly is indeed one of the features of OWL R. This allows
a plain triple store vendor to adopt/add some OWL easily. And I don't 
see any harm in that.

Of course, I don't intend RDFishness to be *the* distinguishing point or 
*the only" distinguishing point. OWL R, as designed, does 
implementations to materialize inference graph and consequently speed up 
query execution.


Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:52:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:04 UTC