Carsten Lutz answered to Ivan Herman: >> It is interesting to note that on such high level there >> is no real difference between DL-Lite and OWL-R, and >> the only way to differentiate them on that level is >> how they are implemented. >Yes, a main difference between DL-Lite and OWL-R is >implementation techniques. In order to get away a bit from this notion of an "implementation techniques" based distinction (although I am personally quite happy with it, because the "users" of our profiles are actually implementors of semantic services or tools or whatever, and they probably often enough *will*, quite significantly, perceive such differences between implementation aspects): What about comparing OWL-R with the other profiles w.r.t. the computational complexity of solving a certain reasoning task, which has not yet been mentioned in the profiles document: Calculating the entailment closure (or perhaps a sized part of it) of a given knowledge base for the respective language? Would this make sense? Cheers, Michael -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:50:08 GMT