I validated the Primer and the Profiles document and they are (now) both valid HTML. I did a check links and the profiles has Ye Olde FavIcn problem (so harmless, yes?). Primer has "borken links" which are namespaces we've not yet settled on (e.g., <http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2>). Should we make these explicitly place holders via the /@@/ technique? There are also "broken fragments", but I don't really understand those. (And suspect some are spurious, e.g., the XML Schema ones.) I can't even find the base URI in the HTML.... (E.g., for <http:// www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ManchesterSyntax>) Cheers, Bijan.Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 11:47:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 April 2008 11:47:07 GMT