W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2008

Primer and Profiles checked

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 12:49:02 +0100
Message-Id: <9D20C79F-9537-41C6-BAC9-2DA26F2F009C@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

I validated the Primer and the Profiles document and they are (now)  
both valid HTML.

I did a check links and the profiles has Ye Olde FavIcn problem (so  
harmless, yes?).

Primer has "borken links" which are namespaces we've not yet settled  
on (e.g., <http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl2>). Should we make these  
explicitly place holders via the /@@/ technique?

There are also "broken fragments", but I don't really understand  
those. (And suspect some are spurious, e.g., the XML Schema ones.) I  
can't even find the base URI in the HTML.... (E.g., for <http:// 

Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 11:47:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:03 UTC