Boris, it may be still time to handle that before publication: in the OWL-R rule description you use owl:equivalentProperties (twice) in Table 2. You also use it in Table 5. It should all be equivalentProperty (ie, singular), per [1] That, actually, raises the small editorial issue whether owl2:disjointObjectProperty should be used rather than owl2:disjointObjectProperties as now (just for consistency). Ivan [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#equivalentProperty-def -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 April 2008 13:38:45 GMT