W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: postponed issues

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:54:50 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20071023.115450.38102682.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Cc: hendler@cs.rpi.edu, public-owl-wg@w3.org

I thought that this was for re-opening closed-but-not-really-resolved
issues.  I didn't think that this held for truely postposed issues (all
10 of them) .

peter

PS:  For those of you who might want a quick run-down of the big 10,
here they are, along with my prognostication of their eventual status:

3.2 Qualified Cardinality Restrictions		in OWL 1.1
4.3 Structured Datatypes  			for new RDF WG
4.4 Extra Logical Feature Set			in OWL 1.1
4.8 Trust and Ontology	  			too hard - research needed
5.4 OWL Quote 					insufficient rigour
5.7 Range restrictions 				in OWL 1.1
5.12 Entailing inconsistencies			much too hard - research needed
5.25 Justifications				out of scope
6.1 Unnamed Individual Restrictions		???
6.2 Compound Keys      				too hard - research needed



From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: postponed issues (was Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday October 24, 2007)
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:23:20 +0100

> 
> We discussed this in the first teleconf [1] and agreed that, rather  
> than migrating these (probably mostly irrelevant) issues, WG members  
> who want to champion an issue from the WebOnt list should simply  
> raise an appropriate new issue.
> 
> Ian
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2007.10.10/Minutes
> 
> 
> On 23 Oct 2007, at 16:02, Jim Hendler wrote:
> 
> > Ian - since I cannot be on the phone:  for the agendum
> >
> > Issues list
> >     * Tracker status
> >     * Migration of OWL 1.1 issues list to tracker
> >     * Proposing new issues
> >
> > I'd note that the charter specifies the list of postponed issues  
> > from the Web Ont WG (OWL 1.0 group) as inputs to this group.  Can  
> > we simply have these migrate to the issues list?  I'd note that  
> > many of them are either dealt with in OWL 1.1 or beyond the scope  
> > of the group, so we could probably dispatch most of them very quickly.
> >    thanks
> >    JH
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Oct 23, 2007, at 10:52 AM, Ian Horrocks wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Master copy is at  http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 
> >> 2007.10.24/Agenda
> >>
> >> Currently version is below.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ian
> >>
> >>
> >> Call in details
> >>
> >>     * Date of Call: Wednesday October 24, 2007
> >>     * Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),  
> >> 1800 (London), 1900 (Paris)
> >>     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
> >>     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
> >>     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
> >>     * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
> >>     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl  
> >> ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
> >>     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi- 
> >> irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
> >>     * Duration: 90 minutes
> >>     * Chair: Alan Ruttenberg, Ian Horrocks
> >>     * Scribe: (Scribe List)
> >>     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ 
> >> Teleconference.2007.10.24/Agenda
> >>
> >> Agenda
> >>
> >>     * ADMIN (10 min)
> >>           o Roll call
> >>           o Agenda amendments
> >>           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
> >>           o Action items status
> >>                 + Action 01: Still in progress.
> >>           o PROPOSED: Edits to the Front Page should be vetted by  
> >> WG chairs
> >>     * Publications (30 min)
> >>           o PROPOSED: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- 
> >> owl-wg/2007Oct/0170.html
> >>           o PROPOSED: Documents to be edited using wiki markup  
> >> facilities (templates, tex math, etc). Revisit if there are problems.
> >>           o Issues list
> >>                 + Tracker status
> >>                 + Migration of OWL 1.1 issues list to tracker
> >>                 + Proposing new issues
> >>     * Task forces (10 min)
> >>           o Backward compatibility audit
> >>           o Test cases
> >>     * Relationships to other W3C groups (overview) (5 min, may  
> >> postpone if time short)
> >>           o Semantic Web Coordination Group
> >>           o Rule Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group
> >>           o Semantic Web Deployment Working Group
> >>           o Semantic Web Education and Outreach Interest Group
> >>           o Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group
> >>           o XML Schema Working Group
> >>           o Technical Architecture Group
> >>           o Uncertainty Reasoning for the Web Incubator Group
> >>     * Relationships to other non-W3C groups (overview) (5 min, may  
> >> postpone if time short)
> >>           o OMG
> >>     * Additional other business (5 min)
> >>
> >> Regrets
> >>
> >>     * James Hendler (through December)
> >>     * Ivan Herman (10.17 and 10.24)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research,  
> > would it?." - Albert Einstein
> >
> > Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
> > Tetherless World Constellation Chair
> > Computer Science Dept
> > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 16:03:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT