W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Homework, updated submission

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:46:15 -0400
Message-Id: <BF6A4DD3-0465-4966-A82F-BF0E77AB6501@gmail.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

I have changed the link to be "OWL 1.1", noting that that the charter  
says:

> Note that this charter uses the term “OWL 1.1” for easy reference.  
> However, it is up to the Working Group to decide whether the final  
> name of the extension will bear the name “OWL 1.1” or not, and  
> whether the new features will be in the same namespace as the  
> current OWL terms or not.

-Alan


On Oct 12, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> It is probably better to *not* call this "Submission".  (W3C might get
> mad at you.)  How about calling it "OWL 1.1"?
>
> Actually, it probably would be even better to have two links, one  
> called
> "Submission" and one called "OWL 1.1".  I note that the charter  
> defines
> the starting point as the submission, i.e., a fixed set of documents,
> but also refers to the OWL 1.1 issues list, which is not.
>
> Actually, even better ....
>
> peter
>
>
> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> Subject: Homework, updated submission
> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:58:23 -0400
>
>>
>> Just a note to point out that we are aiming to read the updated
>> version of the documents that were part of the W3C submission, which,
>> for lack of a better name, is still labeled "Submission" in the
>> navigation bar. Note that the document called "MOF-Based Metamodel"
>> wasn't part of the submission, but should be considered in you
>> reading...
>>
>> Specifically, the URI for these documents is: http://www.webont.org/
>> owl/1.1/
>>
>> -Alan
>>
>>
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 14:46:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:26 GMT