W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Homework, updated submission

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20071012.030049.222186450.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

It is probably better to *not* call this "Submission".  (W3C might get
mad at you.)  How about calling it "OWL 1.1"?

Actually, it probably would be even better to have two links, one called
"Submission" and one called "OWL 1.1".  I note that the charter defines
the starting point as the submission, i.e., a fixed set of documents,
but also refers to the OWL 1.1 issues list, which is not.

Actually, even better ....


From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Homework, updated submission
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:58:23 -0400

> Just a note to point out that we are aiming to read the updated  
> version of the documents that were part of the W3C submission, which,  
> for lack of a better name, is still labeled "Submission" in the  
> navigation bar. Note that the document called "MOF-Based Metamodel"  
> wasn't part of the submission, but should be considered in you  
> reading...
> Specifically, the URI for these documents is: http://www.webont.org/ 
> owl/1.1/
> -Alan
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 07:06:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:59 UTC