- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:35:10 +0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: conrad.bock@nist.gov, alanruttenberg@gmail.com, ekendall@sandsoft.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org, cawelty@gmail.com
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> > 6.1 RDF Triples >> > >> > An RDF triple contains three components: >> > >> > * the subject, which is an RDF URI reference or a blank node >> > * the predicate, which is an RDF URI reference >> > * the object, which is an RDF URI reference, a literal >> > or a blank node >> >> BTW, the question above would not come up without review of the ODM >> metamodel. It gives a less ambiguous description of the above, which is >> just text that doesn't have the detail of "must", and "at least one", >> etc. > > Umm, how is the text above ambiguous? To me, it clearly states that an > RDF triple has to have three components, namely one subject, one > predicate, and one object. Having written that text, if it is ambiguous, I would like to raise an erratum. I believed that it was clear that there was one subject, one predicate and one object. Any claim that it doesn't say that should be directed to www-rdf-comments@w3.org. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 18:35:51 UTC