W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:14:55 -0500
Message-Id: <FB9EE174-64F0-419D-A5EB-0916A9EAC161@gmail.com>
Cc: conrad.bock@nist.gov, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

On Nov 30, 2007, at 4:37 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
>> Agreed, however does it make sense for there to be a storage
>> mechanism for OWL specifically, rather than building on whatever
>> storage mechanism is chosen for RDF?
>>
>> -Alan
> Absolutely.  Tools need to be able to store OWL axioms and facts as
> entities different from RDF triples.  In fact, building an OWL
> structural specification on top of an RDF storage methodology is
> probably the wrong thing to do.

Because...

-Alan
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 10:15:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT