W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: UFDTF Metamodeling Document

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:11:28 -0500
Message-Id: <2C8F93C5-261F-4A6F-8C86-7604734A8343@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Peter F. Patel-Schneider'" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: <conrad.bock@nist.gov>

On Nov 29, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Conrad Bock wrote:

> Boris put it very well in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Oct/0085.html
> where he says it is very useful to have a data storage  
> specification for
> the language (his message would make quite a nice ad for OMG,
> actually!).  It is important that such a storage specification be
> generally agreed if the stored ontologies are to be widely accessible.
> It isn't good for W3C and OMG to adopt different data storage
> specifications for OWL.

Agreed, however does it make sense for there to be a storage  
mechanism for OWL specifically, rather than building on whatever  
storage mechanism is chosen for RDF?

Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 00:11:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:00 UTC