ISSUE-77 (Horn-SHIQ): Extending Horn-SHIQ http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ Raised by: Bijan Parsia On product: (On behalf of Carsten Lutz.) Why Horn-SHIQ, and not Horn-SHIQO, i.e., why not include nominals? I know that nothing has been published on Horn-SHIQO, but the difference to Horn-SHIQ is not so big, and we have enough (wo)man-power and expertise in this group to check whether something breaks w.r.t. Hornness and other desirable properties (it shouldn't!). This remark does not only apply to Horn-SHIQ and not only to nominals: - what other things that are in OWL 1.1 but not in Horn-SHIQ could be added to Horn-SHIQ without loosing nice properties? - In general: shouldn't we try to have the tractable fragments "up to date" with main OWL 1.1? For the case of EL++, I will report on this in a later mail.Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2007 17:17:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT