W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: UFDTF - who are we writing for

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:45:59 +0100
Message-ID: <474C2DA7.1090102@w3.org>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, "OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


Bijan Parsia wrote:
> 
> I think we would do well to 1) have a lightweight introduction (whether
> separate or not is a different issue) and 2) to make the normative
> documentation more accessible and 3) to encourage a rich documentation
> ecosystem that survives and thrives beyond the working group. It's clear
> that, at least at the W3C, a lot of the proposed activity belongs in SWEO:
>     http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/
> 
> """The scope of SWEO group includes:
> the development and collection of use and business cases, stemming from
> both user and vendor companies, and documenting the value of Semantic
> Web technologies
> identifying possible vertical markets and application areas for the
> Semantic Web
> production of clear guidelines for tutorials, presentations, teaching
> materials, FAQ-s, etc, targeted at different audiences"""
> 

Guys, let us not argue with SWEO (neither pro or con). The SWEO charter
expires in two months, it is therefore highly irrelevant for the
discussion in the OWL WG. There may or may not be a new SWEO; if yes, it
may or may not have a different charter; all this is in the air.

Ivan

> 
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> 

-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2007 14:46:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT