Skimming this thread somewhat - I believe the RDF Datatypes design is meant to be open to non-XML Schema datatypes defined by fiat, which may allow a WG to do what Bijan appears to be discussing - e.g. define an owl:integer an owl:real, owl:rational, owl:complex datatypes .... It may even allow for an owl:real datatype whose value space includes all the reals, even those that can't be written down. It would be another little project though, probably out-of-charter (certainly, if the timeline is taken into account). JeremyReceived on Thursday, 15 November 2007 12:36:34 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT