- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 12:36:07 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>, "Web Ontology Language (OWL) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Skimming this thread somewhat - I believe the RDF Datatypes design is meant to be open to non-XML Schema datatypes defined by fiat, which may allow a WG to do what Bijan appears to be discussing - e.g. define an owl:integer an owl:real, owl:rational, owl:complex datatypes .... It may even allow for an owl:real datatype whose value space includes all the reals, even those that can't be written down. It would be another little project though, probably out-of-charter (certainly, if the timeline is taken into account). Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 12:36:34 UTC