W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: Rich Annotations Use Cases

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:58:35 +0000
Message-Id: <F235BF69-D9A0-4943-A523-38F0B2150972@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Vojtech Svatek <Svatek@vse.cz>

On 13 Nov 2007, at 00:44, Vojtech Svatek wrote:
[snip]
> All such 'pattern-oriented' annotation types I have in mind are, in  
> Bijan's
> terms, 'canIgnore' ones

Yep! but they can be very important for roundtripping through a tool.  
For example, if I use one of Protege4s refactoring or "closure" help  
commands, I'd like to *know* that it came from a protege action  
rather than hand modeling.

> (although I am also interested in e.g. uncertainty
> extensions - but that's another story).
>
> My plan now is to have a bit of discussion with some 'patterns'  
> guys first,
> offline, and then return with some consolidated proposal. Bijan,  
> would it
> be OK if I then add a few bullets to [1] at some point?

Of course! Please do!

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 00:57:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT