W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:23:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20071107.132359.119354193.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org

Equivalences are a bit different, as an n-way equivalence can be turned
into n-1 binary equivalences (triples) and thus the need for "special"
RDF syntax for them is lessened.

peter


From: "Boris Motik" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: ISSUE-2 (allDisjoint-RDF): No syntax for AllDisjoint in RDF mapping
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:24:48 -0000

> 
> Hello,
> 
> There are other n-ary constructs in the functional spec that are mapped
> into binary constructs in the RDF: equivalences on classes
> disjointness and equivalences on properties, and sameAs and disjointFrom
> on individuals
> 
> It might make sense to broaden the discussion to these features as well
> 
> Thus, you could view the problem as "whether the RDF mapping should
> always preserve the arity of the construct in the functiona
> spec".
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 	Boris
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 18:35:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT