W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

Re: ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for entities in RDF mapping

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:05:08 -0500
Message-Id: <16D8522B-7FDA-462F-842D-ED5B3C34FB34@cs.rpi.edu>
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>

Rinke - good catch - these should be there.  Also, let's not forget  
that in OWL Full rdfs:class is also part of our language that needs  
to be handled
  -JH
p.s. I was thinking of opening an issue to say we should work on a  
way to allow rdfs:class to be included in OWL DL - right now there  
are many documents on the Web (we've counted several thousand in some  
work we're doing not) which are OWL Full (either RDFS or RDFS with  
some Owl constructs) that become OWL DL if we replace the rdfs:class  
construct with owl:class - some of the current OWL tools do this  
automatically (even though it technically changes the semantics in a  
subtle way) others just barf -- would give us a lot more easy to  
process ontologies if we had a solution (or even a workaround) for this


On Nov 7, 2007, at 9:50 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:

>
>
> ISSUE-54 (Entities as Triples): Translation to Triples missing for  
> entities in RDF mapping
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
>
> Raised by: Rinke Hoekstra
> On product:
>
> The RDF mapping document does not provide a mapping for entities  
> (e.g. OWLClass(X), Datatype(Y) etc.) in Table 2. These mappings  
> should be added.
>
>
>
>
>

"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would  
it?." - Albert Einstein

Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
Tetherless World Constellation Chair
Computer Science Dept
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 15:05:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT