- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:42:32 +0000
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
start time half hour before telecon, Wed.
1730 UTC, 09:30AM (West US), 12:30PM (East US),
17:30 (London), 18:30 (Paris)
1) time of next meeting
suggestion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0114
London 20:00
New York 15:00
Silicon Valley 12:00
Korea 05:00 Fri :(
2) which docs could we/should we start now?
a) overview ala 1.0
Deb has indicated enthusiasm for this one
b) overview ala member submission
Bijan and Peter have indicated enthusiasm
c) use cases and requirements with traceability matrix linking
requirements and OWL 1.1 features
Jeremy and Vipul have indicated enthusiasm
==============================
End of agenda
=============
Some points about item 2:
=========================
I think there is an obvious conflict between doing a) and b) i.e. while
b) could be done as the opening section of an a) type document; it makes
no sense to do both as two separate docs.
I am unclear whether Peter or Bijan is prepared to own (b) if necessary.
I believe Deb is prepared to own (a) but would prefer clarity that this
is understood to be a WD route document before she starts.
Vipul and I are keen to start working on (c) and believe that the final
format can be sorted out later.
Possible considerations under 2
- who do we want to read and review the documents?
- who do we want to be writing the documents?
Deliberately not on agenda
==========================
but still open
What is the format in which we expect public to review these documents:
Jeremy has argued for Working Draft
Bijan for on Wiki
Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 20:43:05 UTC