W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

agenda for UFDTF

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:42:32 +0000
Message-ID: <4730D1B8.9060308@hpl.hp.com>
To: public-owl-wg@w3.org


start time half hour before telecon, Wed.

1730 UTC, 09:30AM (West US), 12:30PM (East US),
17:30 (London), 18:30 (Paris)

1) time of next meeting
suggestion:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2007Nov/0114
London         20:00
New York       15:00
Silicon Valley 12:00
Korea          05:00 Fri :(


2) which docs could we/should we start now?

   a) overview ala 1.0
        Deb has indicated enthusiasm for this one

   b) overview ala member submission
        Bijan and Peter have indicated enthusiasm

   c) use cases and requirements with traceability matrix linking 
requirements and OWL 1.1 features
        Jeremy and Vipul have indicated enthusiasm

==============================
End of agenda
=============

Some points about item 2:
=========================
I think there is an obvious conflict between doing a) and b) i.e. while 
b) could be done as the opening section of an a) type document; it makes 
no sense to do both as two separate docs.

I am unclear whether Peter or Bijan is prepared to own (b) if necessary.

I believe Deb is prepared to own (a) but would prefer clarity that this 
is understood to be a WD route document before she starts.

Vipul and I are keen to start working on (c) and believe that the final 
format can be sorted out later.


Possible considerations under 2

- who do we want to read and review the documents?
- who do we want to be writing the documents?


Deliberately not on agenda
==========================
but still open

What is the format in which we expect public to review these documents:
   Jeremy has argued for Working Draft
   Bijan             for on Wiki


Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 20:43:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT