On Nov 5, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > I already added several issues to the Agenda, more or less starting > from the top. Are these now "open"? Are we discussing whether to open them? > Hopefully some of these are uncontentious. Others may be > contentious but need to be discussed. I don't want to be too > ambitious -- we can continue to work our way down the list if we > finish with these ones :-) Ok. > Regarding annotations, there are already several issues that refer > to annotations. Would it be possible to combine some/all of these > with your proposal (e.g., issue 32). We could then discuss this > consolidated issue. Yep I think: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/12 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/16 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/20 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/32 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/40 and my email thread can be consolidated under "Annotation System" or "rich annotations". If we can reach a bit of consensus behind my straw design, I (or someone!) can turn it into a concrete proposal trying to address all the issuelets involved. Cheers, Bijan.Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 23:35:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT