Re: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev) from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2007-11-02 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from November 2007)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:30:02 -0400 (EDT)
To: jjc@hpl.hp.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20071102.093002.32496943.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

I replied to Michael's message in the public-owl-dev list.

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Subject: Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (from public-owl-dev)
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:49:27 +0000

> Since Michael Schneider has argued my corner much better than I could 
> myself, I thought I might quote him in full ...
> 
> To my mind this is a devestating critique of the current punning design.
> (I hope it is not offensive to state my technical opinion in a 
> forthright manner)
> 
> Jeremy

Well one mind's devestation is another mind's conservetion.  :-)

peter

Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 13:42:25 UTC