- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:06:36 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
oops... meant this to go to the list. -Rinke Begin forwarded message: > From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> > Date: 2 november 2007 13:06:03 GMT+01:00 > To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu> > Subject: Re: ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct > > On 2 nov 2007, at 12:54, Jim Hendler wrote: >> >> s/poduct/product -- problem is I couldn't figure out how to change >> it in the issue tracker once I made the typo -- I'd have no >> objection if someone could fix it. > > I just fixed it. If you select the issue by clicking on its name in > the list. The tracker will show a page with issue details. There is > an 'Edit this issue' link on the right. > For some reason, this link is not present on the page that confirms > any changes made to the issue. > > Best, > Rinke > > >> On Nov 2, 2007, at 7:51 AM, OWL Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> ISSUE-51 (Language Name): Name of the Poduct >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ >>> >>> Raised by: James Hendler >>> On product: >>> >>> This should be obvious, but I thought we should get it in the >>> issue list before the first documents go out. When this WG was >>> proposed, there was a lot of pushback against the name OWL 1.1 >>> (some people didn't like version numbers at all, some thought this >>> was the wrong version number, and there were a couple of other >>> comments in various mailing lists). Our charter is careful and >>> never calls the output of the group OWL 1.1, it simply uses that >>> term to refer to the member submission. >>> >>> The WG has to decide affirmatively whether to go forward with the >>> 1.1 name or whether to use another name (DLOWL, OWL 2, OWL). In >>> addition, since the charter stresses backward compatibility, we'll >>> probably have to make sure there is some documentation of how to >>> refer to the older version (which was never called OWL 1.0) >>> >>> >>> >> >> "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, >> would it?." - Albert Einstein >> >> Prof James Hendler http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler >> Tetherless World Constellation Chair >> Computer Science Dept >> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180 >> >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ---------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.nl/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands ----------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 2 November 2007 12:06:48 UTC