W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: OWL XML syntax?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:27:11 +0000
Message-Id: <50CCBC2D-D4E0-4E79-B4AD-51D780E2750E@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>

On 21 Dec 2007, at 16:17, Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> Is there [going to be] an XML syntax corresponding to the  
> functional syntax?

I hope so. I was planning to raise it as an issue soon as the core  
documents are out.

> Will it be normative?

I hope so. There are a number of situations where RDF/XML is not XML  
tool friendly enough for easy adoption (in particular, for web  
services it really helps to be XML schema "friendly").

> Jeremy
>
> (Honest question .... I'm wondering about hanging the axiom  
> annotations off bits of such a syntax rather than off reifications)

Intriguing...say more?

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 21 December 2007 16:25:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:29 GMT