W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

RE: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not strings

From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 11:24:57 -0000
To: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001301c84231$c95f8410$4911a8c0@wolf>

Hello,

I have just updated the diagrams structural specification to use URIs instead of strings. I propose to close this issue.

Regards,

	Boris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter F. Patel-
> Schneider
> Sent: 02 December 2007 12:28
> To: ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk
> Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not
> strings
> 
> 
> The problem here is in the structural specification, i.e., the
> diagrams.  There has been a change in Section 2.1 of SS&FS to partly
> alleviate the issue:
> 
> 	If o1 and o2 are atomic values, such as strings, integers, or
> 	IRI (URI), they are structurally equivalent if they are equal
> 	using equality for their atomic type, i.e., they are the same
> 	string, integer, or IRI.
> 
> However, the underlying type used throughout the diagrams for IRIs is
> string, not IRI, leading to the conclusion that the values are strings
> and that string equality is to be used.
> 
> peter
> 
> 
> 
> From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: ISSUE-49 (structural IRIs): REPORTED: structural specification should use IRIs, not
> strings
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 19:55:05 +0000
> 
> >
> > Seems to me that this has been addressed by the use of CURIES
> > (ISSUE-14) and the fact that Section 2.2 [1] now says:
> >
> > The syntax of full and abbreviated IRIs in OWL 1.1 is defined as
> > follows.
> >
> > Full-IRI := '<' IRI as defined in [RFC-3987] '>'
> > Abbreviated-IRI := curie
> > URI := Full-IRI | Abbreviated-IRI
> >
> > Unless I hear to the contrary I will close this issue as RESOLVED.
> >
> > Ian
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#URIs.2C_Namespaces.
> > 2C_and_Integers
> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2007 11:43:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:29 GMT