- From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:05:58 +0100
- To: Bernardo Cuenca Grau <Bernardo.Grau@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Hi Bernardo, Slightly more on-topic than my previous email. Several WG members have vented concern (at the F2F) regarding the use of OWL 1.1 to mean only the DL version of our proposal. It seems the tractable fragments document uses OWL 1.1 in the DL-sense throughout. Perhaps we/you/I could change all OWL 1.1's to OWL 1.1 DL's to prevent sore toes. (I had already adapted the previous version of the fragments picture and can easily create a new version, using mathcal fonts). Best, Rinke On 18 dec 2007, at 13:54, Bernardo Cuenca Grau wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have made quite a few changes in the Fragments document to address > some of the issues raised within the WG. Here's a summary of the > changes: > > - EL++ : included material from Carsten's wiki on EL++. Added a > grammar for facts > - DL-Lite: Added grammar for facts > - DLP: Deleted from the spec > - Horn-SHIQ: quite a few changes in the grammar according to > Borise's comments. Also, added a grammar for Facts > - RDFS: Added a grammar for facts. > > The figure that represents the relationships between the fragments > has also changed. > > Please, feel free to comment on all this! > > Cheers, > > Bernardo > > ----------------------------------------------- Drs. Rinke Hoekstra Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands -----------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 15:06:06 UTC