W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: Links to implementation lists

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:32:51 +0100
Message-ID: <47541393.3040502@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, OWL WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Sandro et al,

I would very much favour the wiki page approach. The reason why I
created the


page over a year ago was exactly because maintaining that list (I had
the same problem with the RDF list) became a hurdle. Over the year the
wiki page worked well, I had to get some spam out only once or twice,
and that is it. There will be life after the OWL WG, so better to

Whether the OWL list would be part of that one, or a separate list is a
detail, I am pretty much o.k. with either way.


Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> writes:
>> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/impls
> ...
>> Ah, this link is included in *all* (nearly all?) the documents  
>> (because of boilerplate status sections). That seems very  
>> undesirable. Indeed, I would love it if we could either update the  
>> implementations page (and have some hope of continued updatedness),  
>> or have the page radically trimmed with a "This page got so out of  
>> date as to be seriously misleading. If you want access to the  
>> historical page, see blah."
> Ugh, yeah.  My inclination is for us to make a wiki page for
> implementations and redirect the above page to it.  It would be a wiki
> page that would live past the end of this WG, maintained as a public
> wiki page.  (IE, it would be writable to everyone, not just WG members,
> and people who care about it would have to subscribe so they can watch
> for hostile changes.)
> My inclination is to make the redirect at the HTTP level (301 Moved
> Permanently), but if people are attached to the content on WebOnt/impls,
> we could leave it intact and just put a prominent alert box on the page,
> pointing people at the new wiki implementations page.
> Another option is to just use
>     http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebTools
> My guess is that we want a page focussed in more detail on OWL
> implementations and that we have the energy to maintain it.
>        -- Sandro


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Monday, 3 December 2007 14:32:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:01 UTC