- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:54:20 +0000
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Dec 1, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote: > On 25 Nov 2007, at 10:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > [snip] > >> ISSUE-32 requests annotation values that are objects as allowed in >> OWL >> 1.0. Perhaps I don't fully understand the problem, but it appears >> to me >> that OWL 1.1 already allows annotation values to be OWL entities, >> which >> provides the same facility as in OWL 1.0. I thus don't see that any >> further extension to annotations is needed to solve this issue. > > This appears to me to be a non-issue, i.e., it asks for something > that is already there. Unless I hear to the contrary I will REJECT > and CLOSE it. Not that this changes anything, but I think at one point this wasn't true and Boris changed it...so either way it should be closed. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2007 20:54:37 UTC