W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: ISSUE-32 complex annotations

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 20:54:20 +0000
Message-Id: <D3791BED-3D0C-4847-A177-B638A6262E46@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>

On Dec 1, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote:

> On 25 Nov 2007, at 10:52, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> ISSUE-32 requests annotation values that are objects as allowed in  
>> OWL
>> 1.0.  Perhaps I don't fully understand the problem, but it appears  
>> to me
>> that OWL 1.1 already allows annotation values to be OWL entities,  
>> which
>> provides the same facility as in OWL 1.0.  I thus don't see that any
>> further extension to annotations is needed to solve this issue.
>
> This appears to me to be a non-issue, i.e., it asks for something  
> that is already there. Unless I hear to the contrary I will REJECT  
> and CLOSE it.

Not that this changes anything, but I think at one point this wasn't  
true and Boris changed it...so either way it should be closed.

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2007 20:54:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:29 GMT