W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > January to March 2013

Survey on ontology pitfalls importance

From: Marķa Poveda <mpoveda@fi.upm.es>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:31:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+mx6Z1ZNiZRS_xY50TW+ycKGHyODWJMT-MOCC6QKXvBSC7d1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Hi all,

   since we made available our ontology evaluation tool OOPS! [1] several
users have asked for indicators about how critical each pitfall is.
Up to now the pitfall catalogue maintained within OOPS! [2] contains 35
pitfalls. In order to improve the catalogue and the tool we are going to
associate an indicator to each pitfall according to their possible negative
consequences. For doing so, we would like to take ontology developers,
people with background or interest in ontology evaluation and ontology
modelling, and OOPS! users opinions into account.

We'd be happy if you take the time to fill in the questionnaire here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFBqT1N1a3dHQWZ2SjJOeG41OTliaXc6MQ#gid=0

The questionnaire takes you less than 20 minutes, it can be answered
anonymously and will be open until the 12th of February. We will publish
the survey results and update OOPS! according to such results.

For any further information please contact us via e-mail (
oops@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es)

Thank you very much for your help and cooperation!

Best,

Marķa and Mari Carmen

[1] http://www.oeg-upm.net/oops
[2] http://www.oeg-upm.net/oops/catalogue.jsp

P.D: Please forward this email to any person interested in this topic you
might know.
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 10:31:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:33:00 GMT