Re: new topic: Should Closed World Assumption(CWA) and Open World Assumption(OWA) be integrated?

I guess you forgot my favourite reference on Local CWA :-)

Inanç Seylan, Enrico Franconi, Jos de Bruijn: Effective Query Rewriting with Ontologies over DBoxes. IJCAI 2009: 923-925.
http://ijcai.org/papers09/Papers/IJCAI09-157.pdf

cheers
--e.

On 20 Aug 2011, at 02:16, Pascal Hitzler wrote:

> Check on literature concerning local closed world semantics for
> description logics. That's exactly about combining OWA and CWA. You'll
> find quite a bit.
> 
> Just some pointers - the first two contain good related work sections:
> 
> Adila Alfa Krisnadhi, Frederick Maier, Pascal Hitzler
> OWL and Rules.
> In: A. Polleres, C. d'Amato, M. Arenas, S. Handschuh, P. Kroner, S.
> Ossowski, P.F. Patel-Schneider (eds.), Reasoning Web. Semantic
> Technologies for the Web of Data. 7th International Summer School 2011,
> Galway, Ireland, August 23-27, 2011, Tutorial Lectures. Lecture Notes in
> Computer Science Vol. 6848, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.
> To appear.
> 
> Adila Krisnadhi, Kunal Sengupta, Pascal Hitzler
> Local Closed World Semantics: Keep it simple, stupid!
> In: Riccardo Rosati, Sebastian Rudolph, Michael Zakharzaschev,
> Proceedings of the 2011 International Workshop on Description Logics
> (DL2011), Barcelona, Spain, July 2011. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol.
> 745, pp. 532-542.
> 
> Kunal Sengupta, Adila Krisnadhi, Pascal Hitzler
> Local Closed World Reasoning: Grounded Circumscription for OWL.
> In: Proceedings ISWC2011.
> To appear.
> 
> Stephan Grimm, Pascal Hitzler
> Semantic Matchmaking of Web Resources with Local Closed-World Reasoning.
> International Journal of e-Commerce 12 (2), 89-126, Winter 2007-8.
> 
> - in these papers you also find pointers to work by others on this
> topic. The papers are available from my homepage
> http://www.pascal-hitzler.de/ , but it's down for maintenance this
> weekend. Send me an email if you want the pdfs earlier.
> 
> Pascal.
> 
> On 8/19/2011 3:22 AM, duanyucong wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dear all, I propose an discussion on new topic: Should Closed World
>> Assumption(CWA) and Open World Assumption(OWA) be integrated? My
>> initial argumentations: CWA vs. OWA could be interprated at serveral
>> levels:(1) as notations: CWA and OWA are supposed to be bound to
>> concepts(CPT);we also call that this argumentation is at notation
>> expression level.At this level, integration means simply composition
>> of notations. (2) as concepts: CWA and OWA are supposed to represent
>> the semantics of the individuals who utilize these two concepts to
>> construct their expressions;we also call that this argumentation is
>> at conceptual level (conceptual modeling);At this level, integration
>> actually rely on the integration of both notations and semantics. (3)
>> as semantics: CWA and OWA are different in the sense of existence or
>> ontologically.They can not be integrated since that the level of
>> existence is supposed to be not transcendable in an ultimate sense.We
>> call that this level is at semantic leve! l.At this level,
>> integration action will mean defying the sense of ultimate of
>> existence/ontology which is the inner character of semantic.Whatever
>> can be done at this level is to identify the order (ORD) and
>> classification (CLA) for the reference of conceptual modeling and
>> validation of compositions of notations of concepts. Sincerely,
>> Yucong Duan
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Prof. Dr. Pascal Hitzler
> Dept. of Computer Science, Wright State University, Dayton, OH
> pascal@pascal-hitzler.de   http://www.knoesis.org/pascal/
> Semantic Web Textbook: http://www.semantic-web-book.org
> Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
>

Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 14:33:15 UTC