W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: How to put "universal" restrictions to members of two classes

From: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE <fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:30:16 +0900
To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Cc: fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com
Message-Id: <20100906152859.A28A.60B3E2E2@jp.panasonic.com>
Hi Pavel, Uli,

Sorry for the delay in responding.

Pavel wrote:
> I've tried to look for the previous discussions but couldn't find the
> one which gives 100% the same trick (I'm sure Uli Sattler suggested it
> in some thread but not sure if it was on public-owl-dev or elsewhere).
> I kind of implied it here [1] but the discussion was a bit different.
> 
> Cheers,
> Pavel
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2009AprJun/0067.html

Uli wrote:
> Also, Pavel's suggestion is, I think, from a paper by Rudolph, Kroetzsch and Hitzler "all ephants are bigger than all mice"

I read the paper and it was there with the name "concept product".

I'm going to give some names to the "bidges" and reuse them.
But it wold be nice for the next version of OWL(?) to have some syntactic sugars
(to hide them from users), for example adding "anyValuesFrom" or something 
in line with "someValuesFrom", although I haven't checked what kind of discussions has been made
in the OWL WG yet.

Thank you very much for you kind advices.

Best,
Yoshio

---
Yoshio FUKUSHIGE
(Advisory Specialist for Consumers' Affairs)
VOC Office
CS Promotion Center
AVC Networks Company, Panasonic Corporation
+81-6-6905-5255 ;  7-678-6369
Received on Monday, 6 September 2010 06:30:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:58 GMT