W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: Which API ?

From: Pradeep Shankar <pradeep20081@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 02:46:44 +0100
Message-ID: <50a1d7431001231746r577370f6jc3e417bf0b9fb4fc@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote:

> On 22 Jan 2010, at 00:04, Pradeep Shankar wrote:
>  Hi,
>> I have a abstract idea about a project. In my project, I want to have an
>> OWL ontology, SWRL rules, and may be
>> queries which I want to use in a java program.
> For most of that the OWL API works pretty well. If your queries are SPARQL
> queries, Jena may be a better fit. Pellet works with either. More reasoners
> (to my knowledge) work with the OWL API.

 What I understood about SPARQL is that - it is just able to query over RDF.
When SPARQL makes query over OWL, it does not provide entailed results. I
also want to achieve entailed results. So which query language I should use?

>  In order to realize this idea what API or framework I should use, such
>> that I can use reasoning power of OWL, SWRL,
>> and possibly query over the asserted knowledge.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Received on Sunday, 24 January 2010 01:47:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:18 UTC