W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: OWL 2 is now a W3C Proposed Recommendation

From: Bene Rodriguez-Castro <beroca@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:01:12 +0100
Message-ID: <ea8cd28f0910091301u33a30dedqe2f6654b73a720a1@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Hi,

Is there a specific prefix or base URI designated for OWL 2?

OWL 1 provides the URI <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl>
Loading this URI in SWOOP, Protege 4.x or TopBraid Composer gives a
neat ontology representation of the different modelling elements
available in OWL 1.

I was looking at the documents listed in the previous email (and
different references in them) for a corresponding URI in the context
of OWL 2 that I could load in any of these editors, but these
documents still refer to the OWL 1 URI <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl>

Thanks in advance for any comments you may have.

Bene Rodriguez

Postgraduate Student | Intelligence, Agents and Multimedia Group |
School of Electronics and Computer Science | University of Southampton
| Southampton SO17 1BJ | United Kingdom



On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> Following a successful Candidate Recommendation phase, during which we
> received reports of more than a dozen implementations [1], OWL 2 has
> advanced to Proposed Recommendation.  During this four-week phase, W3C
> member organizations [2] have a chance decide whether OWL 2 should be
> published as a W3C Recommendation.
>
> We have published new versions of the documents [3], but the changes
> since Candidate Recommendation are all minor and editorial.  (The
> changes are detailed in a changelog in each document.)  No changes to
> software or ontologies should be required.
>
> The new publications are linked from our documentation roadmap:
>
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-owl2-overview-20090922/#Documentation_Roadmap
>
> Comments are best sent to public-owl-comments@w3.org.  General
> discussion of OWL 2 is probably best done on public-owl-dev@w3.org [4].
>
>    -- Sandro   (W3C Staff Contact, OWL WG)
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Implementations
> [2] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
> [3] http://www.w3.org/News/2009#item166
> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/
>
>
Received on Friday, 9 October 2009 21:12:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:57 GMT