It might be useful to reference the discussion between the OWL WG and the SKOS WG(?), including the thread started at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0059.html, from this document. peter From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> Subject: [Fwd: SKOS and OWL2] Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:47:37 -0500 > > Might be interesting, for those not on the SKOS list... > > Dan > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: SKOS and OWL2 > Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:21:43 +0000 > Resent-From: public-esw-thes@w3.org > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 17:12:42 +0300 > From: Georgia Solomou <solomou@hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr> > To: <public-esw-thes@w3.org> > CC: Dimitrios Koutsomitropoulos <kotsomit@hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr> > > > > Hello, > > Me and my colleagues are working on expressing in OWL 2 some semantic > conditions described in the SKOS Reference document. In particular, we > work on those semantic conditions that are not yet formally expressed in > the current SKOS Schema. We provide a draft of this work at [1]. Your > comments and remarks are welcome. > > Kind Regards, > > Georgia Solomou > > [1] http://apollo.hpclab.ceid.upatras.gr:8001/hpclabwiki/Skos2Owl2 > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is > believed to be clean. >Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2009 17:48:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:42:01 GMT