- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:19:09 +0000
- To: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Hi, here is a draft response to LC comment 45. Cheers, Uli ----------- Dear Marko, thank you for your comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0050.html on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. We acknowledge the importance of implementations and tool support and, indeed, implementations supporting OWL 2 will be a condition for the standardization of OWL 2. It is, however, not in the scope of this working group to standardize communications protocols [1]. On the other hand, we will publish a document of test cases [2] and would welcome help in the generation and testing of these cases. So, if you think that OWLlink would be a suitable tool for testing our test cases, then it would be great if you could coordinate with the working group, for example Markus Kroetzsch and Mike Smith. Please acknowledge receipt of this email to public-owl-comments@w3.org (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. Regards, Uli Sattler on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/OWLCharter.html [2] http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/OWL_2_Test_Cases
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2009 19:19:39 UTC