W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Graphical notation standard for OWL

From: Marcel Ferrante <marcelf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 08:35:56 -0200
Message-ID: <920c1d2b0812260235n2327272bic896d5c7a581301@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Hi Elisa,

Im reading the ODM specification and a important point is the ODM is
necessary because UML doesnt have semantic enough
to represent completely a ontology model like OWL DL.

But, I read the OWLbase metamodel and I cant see a *new symbol* from UML
created to these situations. Maybe because
I dont expert in UML either...So can you indicate it for me ?

Thanks a lot,

2008/12/20 Elisa Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>

>> The closest thing to a standardized graphical notation is the OMG work:
>>        http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/UML_Concrete_Syntax
>> This may be revised in light of OWL 2.
> Thanks for the plug, Bijan :).  This prompted me to revise the page, linked
> above, which now reflects links to the latest version of the ODM, now a
> formally adopted OMG standard, etc.
> Evan Wallace and I gave a tutorial on this awhile back at an OMG meeting,
> and are planning to update it for the March 2009 OMG meeting in Washington
> DC.  If anyone is interested, let me know and I can provide details on the
> meeting or the old slides, as desired.
> Best regards,
> Elisa

Marcel Ferrante Silva
Doutorando em Ciência da Informação - ECI/UFMG
+55 31 8851-9069 2626-2859
MSN: marcelferrante@hotmail.com
Received on Friday, 26 December 2008 10:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:17 UTC