W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2008

ISSUE-147 Our DatatypeUnionOf is not XSD's (semantically)?

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:14:54 +0200
Message-Id: <2168E3F6-6E8A-43EB-A5AA-F3AD90C10021@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>

Issue 147 proposes union datatypes (i.e., integer OR string). XML  
schema already has a sort of union datatype:

We're not going to use the XSD union (at least its semantics).

(Everything I say is a bit provisional the moment as I've not  
spelunked in any formal semantics.)

Intuitively, XML Schema union vs what we want is a bit like union in  
SPARQL vs. unionOf in OWL. I hope. I was looking for backup on this  
and am not immediately finding it. It depends on the problem one is  
considering (i.e., recognition vs. schema consistency checking).

So I was bit glib in my assertion that one *couldn't* reuse union,  
but maybe it's just easier not to use it?

Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 08:15:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:17 UTC