On Aug 2, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Jeff Thompson wrote: > > Consider the rule that if X desires Y and X can_do Y, then X does Y. > In Prolog, this would be: > > does(X, Y) :- desires(X, Y), can_do(X, Y). > > This is really defining 'does' as the intersection of the > properties 'desires' and 'can_do'. > I couldn't find something like this in the OWL use cases. Is there > a way to do this in OWL2? does subPropertyOf desires. does subPropertyOf can_do. ? Cheers, Bijan.Received on Saturday, 2 August 2008 23:20:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:56 GMT