I'm kind of dissatisfied with the use of the terms "assertion" and "declaration" in the OWL literature. Axioms like DisjointClasses(C,D) are often called "class assertions", and axioms like FunctionalObjectProperty(P) are called "(object) property assertions". Unfortunately, also Abox assertions like ClassAssertion(a C) are called "class assertion"s, and Abox assertions like ObjectPropertyAssertion(P a b) are called (object) "property assertions". The former type of assertions are sometimes called "declarations", but unfortunately OWL has a different notion of declaration, like Declaration(OWLClass(A)). Any suggestion on how to call axioms like DisjointClasses(C,D) and FunctionalObjectProperty(P) without creating confusion? Marco ColombettiReceived on Thursday, 27 March 2008 16:36:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 March 2008 16:36:23 GMT