- From: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:54:03 -0000 (GMT)
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Matthew Pocock" <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
>> However, while this gets arround the problems with the a-box >> approach, this >> has introduced a new named class with a necesarily ugly name. > > Is it? Do you need the name? Not in OWL. You can write: > > causes some "karaoke singing experience < "beer drinking experience" > > directly. Doesn't this imply that every "karaoke singing experience" is caused by a "beer drinking experience"? So, let's say that sometimes karaoke is caused by being polite to visitors. Something more like this would seem to be closer: intersection(causes some "karaoke singing experience" "beer drinking experience") < OWL:Thing I don't know how to get statements like this into Protege, although the xml encoding is obvious. > Cheers, > Bijan. Matthew
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2008 13:54:54 UTC