Re: OWL (or RDFS) and RDF and language tags

Bijan Parsia wrote:

> 
> You missed the point that I wouldn't *use* a language tag per se, but 
> *encode* the language tag inside the string itself. Hence the need to 
> "convert to/fro normal langed literals". This is a *workaround* and I 
> pretty explicitly pointed out that it requires custom code. If that 
> custom code worked at the application and import/export layers, it 
> should be fine. Not pretty, but fine.
> 

Ok - with custom code ... that is a way to go, but ...

Jeremy