W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2007


From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:47:47 +0000
Message-Id: <A2993B0A-FDAB-4581-93E6-1D8C652FB1CF@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
To: james.lapalme@videotron.ca

On Oct 30, 2007, at 12:52 AM, james.lapalme@videotron.ca wrote:

> Hi,
> I am new to the world of OWL and the semantic web.
> I have found the web site of the BestPractices-Software
> engineering group.
> The site mentions Composite Inverse Functional Property in the
> deliveries section.

(Composite, or compound Functional properties are cool too ;))

> Has anything work been done on this subject, for I am very
> interested in any information regard this subject?

I don't know about the BPSW work, but there's an OWLED task force:
that is working on an "easy keys" proposal:

which most likely will include compound keys. It has the start of a  

You might find this paper:
interesting as well. (The terminology is a bit different, but where  
you see "identification" think "keys".) Turns out, perhaps  
unsurprisingly, that DL-Lite_a plus compound keys is still database  

Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 07:48:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:16 UTC