Hi, The spec for owl 1.1 defines equality over expressions. However, I can't see where it defines ordering over expressions. The haskell code I've got does provide a total ordering over all bits of the owl 1.1 syntax, meaning that I always process/serialize statements in a consistent order. This is particularly important in the xml serialization, particularly if we wish to be able to do diffs. Have I missed the bit that talks about cannonical orderings? Is there an expected (although not required) order in which we should serialize elements to xml? Thanks, MatthewReceived on Thursday, 13 September 2007 09:58:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:15 GMT