W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: Specifiying that an individual has a set of values

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 22:58:59 -0400
Message-Id: <C2CAE56B-57CF-437D-9FE7-0DB6884E6D8A@gmail.com>
Cc: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
To: Matt Williams <matthew.williams@cancer.org.uk>
Is this what you are looking for?

(with-ontology example ()
	     ((class !breast-cancer :partial)
	      (individual !tumor1 (type !breast-cancer))
	      (individual !tumor2 (type !breast-cancer))
	      (individual !tumor3 (type !breast-cancer))
	      (class !increase-in-breast-cancer-disease-free-survival :partial)
	      (individual !increase-in-brca-dfs-1 (type !increase-in-breast- 
cancer-disease-free-survival))
	      (object-property !refers-to (inverse-of !is-referred-to-by))
	      (equivalent-classes
	       (restriction !is-referred-to-by (has-value !increase-in-brca- 
dfs-1))
	       !breast-cancer))
	   (describe-entity !increase-in-brca-dfs-1))
=>

Individual http://example.com/#increase-in-brca-dfs-1
All Types: ex:increase-in-breast-cancer-disease-free-survival
Direct Types: ex:increase-in-breast-cancer-disease-free-survival
!ex:refers-to: !ex:tumor2, !ex:tumor3, !ex:tumor1

RDF/XML attached.

Could I ask what's the idea you're trying to implement (I'm just  
curious)

-Alan



On Aug 23, 2007, at 11:12 AM, Matt Williams wrote:

>
> Dear All,
>
> I don't think this is possible, but thought I would ask.
>
> I am trying to define an ontology which discusses both some cancers  
> and changes in survival due to the cancers. I am interested in  
> "prototypical" cancers rather than individual people's tumours.
>
> I have a T-Box which defines certain classes of cancer, which is  
> ok. Then I have some of these prototypical instances, which is also  
> ok.
>
> The problem comes when I try and discuss changes in survival. I  
> have a class of "Increase in Breast Cancer Disease Free  
> Survival" (and others of Decrease and No change). However, what I  
> would like to to say is that an individual in this class refers to  
> all of the prototypical instances of breast cancer.
>
> At the moment, I have to do this manually; I would like to be able  
> to state that an individual in "Increase in BrCa DFS" is linked by  
> the "refersTo" property to every instance in the "Breast Cancer"  
> class.
>
> Has anyone else had an issue like this? Or does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Matt
>
>
> -- 
> http://acl.icnet.uk/~mw
> http://adhominem.blogsome.com/
> +44 (0)7834 899570
>



Received on Friday, 24 August 2007 02:59:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:55 GMT