Re: Defining Classes by datatype ranges

Evan Wallace points out to me (off list) that family.owl is a bit  
funky there with regard to the datatype support (and there's a bit of  
hinkiness in the specs as well). But you get the idea. Certainly the  
*intent* is to have this sort of capability, but it seems there's a  
bit of polishing to do.

Cheers,
Bijan.