W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: declaredAs

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:49:08 -0400
Message-Id: <C93CE05F-B29C-4078-94C4-93A1CD90F2D7@gmail.com>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Michael Schneider" <m_schnei@gmx.de>, public-owl-dev@w3.org, bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> 

Does it break it, or does it make the OWL-1.1 entailments only be a  
subset of OWL-Full entailments.
If it breaks, could you say how please?
-Alan

On Aug 9, 2007, at 12:23 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:

> Not really. Im sure it was meant to have this intention, but the  
> effect of moving to punning is two-fold: it breaks the OWL Full  
> semantics, and it breaks the semantic connection between OWL and  
> RDF. Neither of which are desirable, IMO, though both of them are  
> in line with a certain perspective that has long been associated  
> with Manchester
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 16:49:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:52 GMT