W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: declaredAs

From: Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:34:03 +0200
Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org, bmotik@cs.man.ac.uk, phayes@ihmc.us
Message-ID: <20070809123403.101080@gmx.net>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

Hi, Bijan!

Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 9 Aug 2007, at 12:59, Michael Schneider wrote:
> > This is an easy one to counter: This whole thread is about a  
> > proposed feature for OWL-1.1, which is planned to become the  
> > successor of OWL/DL. So I regard bringing OWL-Full or even other  
> > languages into play here as simply to be off-topic! :)
> [snip]
> This is not quite correct, or at least overstrong. OWL 1.1 is indeed  
> centered on OWL DL but is an attempt to move toward a revision of  
> *OWL*. Thus the WG will take OWL 1.1 as an input, but, presumably,  
> work to flesh out other OWL Full aspects (punning is, in fact, a move  
> in this direction).

Alright, this is what I wanted to know. I was just about starting another thread here called "What happens to OWL-Full?", but this is not necessary anymore. I will wait and see, what is going to happen. (And will then probably have a few more annoying questions again. ;-)) Thanks!


Michael Schneider <m_schnei@gmx.de>
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 12:34:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:15 UTC