Dan Connolly wrote: > According to http://www.w3.org/Submission/owl11-rdf_mapping/ > > that seems to map to > > (parent brother) rdfs:subPropertyOf uncle. > > Meanwhile, the domain of rdfs:subPropertyOf is Property. > So (parent brother) is a Property? I can't see any critical > problems just now, but it seems a little odd. How so? Making the bnode explicit: _:p rdfs:subPropertyOf uncle. _:p = (parent brother). There exist a thing (_:p) that is a subPropertyOf uncle (and hence it is a property), which equals parent composed with brother. Doesn't that read OK? Jeremy -- Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN Registered No: 690597 EnglandReceived on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:22:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:52 GMT