W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: owl xml serialization

From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:45:24 +0100
Message-Id: <5B2DDCF7-916A-4FAB-8606-5CAED89E71ED@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>

Hi Matthew,

Sorry to hear that you are not having a very good experience with the  
OWL 1.1 XML syntax spec. I would like to second Bijan's request that  
you document your experiences so that they can contribute to  
improving the quality of the spec.


On 10 Jul 2007, at 16:07, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 10 Jul 2007, at 15:45, Matthew Pocock wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I've reached the point where I'm writing the xml serializer/ 
>> deserializer for
>> my haskell owl 1.1 library. I've read through the syntax document  
>> [1] and
>> also through the xsd but these alone don't give enough info to be  
>> able to
>> work out exactly what goes where.
> Not to mention that the XML syntax documents examples are  
> horrifically unfriendly, what with qnames from hell scattered  
> about. I find it much pleasanter to read/write with a default  
> namespace for the syntax.
>> In particular, I couldn't find examples in
>> these docs about how to treat data values or annotations.
>> I'm resorting to generating little bits of OWL 1.1 in protege4 and  
>> then making
>> my code round-trip to this. Not ideal, as I'll end up reproducing  
>> any bugs in
>> the OWL 1.1 library used by protege4.
>> Is there a normative 'how to roundtrip the uml/functional syntax  
>> with xml'
>> document?
> No, but there should be. I keep meaning to take up the XML syntax  
> document which was quite neglected, but other things intervene.  
> Presuming there will be a WG, I would imagine this is something  
> they could take up. For now, if you are taking notes on what you're  
> doing you could either file them as issues or you could set up a  
> wiki page (or a side document) to keep track on:
> 	http://code.google.com/p/owl1-1/
> I have a sneaky idea on how to specify this...
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2007 14:45:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:15 UTC