Re: OWL 1.1 submitted to W3C (broken link fixed)

Evren Sirin wrote:
> I'm not sure if we are supposed to send the bugs about W3C submission 
> to this list
yes, all sorts of comments are in order.

Sorry about the broken link; I think it's fixed now. If not, let us know.

> but here it is:
>
> The link to the [OWL 1.1 Specification] reference at
>
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/owl11-overview/
>
> is pointing to
>
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/SUBM-owl11-owl_specification-20061219/
>
> which does not exist. The page you get following the "This version" 
> link points to the correct URL:
>
> http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-owl11-owl_specification-20061219/
>
> Cheers,
> Evren
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/